• Home
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    •  Overview
    • Business Litigation
    • Corporate Contractual Consulting
    • Corporate/Partnership Formation
    • Criminal Defense
    • Employment
    • Estate Planning
    • Estate/Probate Litigation
    • Family Law
    • Insurance
    • Partnership Disputes
  • News
  • Questions
  • Contact Us
image

Members:
Login | Register | Member List

Monthly Archives

  • October 2008
  • November 2007
  • Complete Archives
  • Category Archives

Most recent entries

  • TGL Wine and Gifts, Inc. v. Kilroan Investments, Inc. and Michael J. Macmanus, Jr.
  • Cricket Communications, Inc. v. Trillium Industries, Inc.
  • CSA-Credit Solutions of America, Inc. v. Precept Financial Solutions Inc.
  • Meadowbrook Homes v. Jerry Sandoval

Syndicate

  • Atom
  • RSS 2.0

Join our Mailing List

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Cricket Communications, Inc. v. Trillium Industries, Inc.

Cricket Communications, Inc. v. Trillium Industries, Inc., et al.; Cause No. 03-1257, in the 116th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Mr. Hanshaw represented Defendant, Trillium Industries, Inc., who was sued by Plaintiff Cricket Communications for over $20 Million in damages for claims of breach of contract, bailment, and negligence, among others.  Mr. Hanshaw was successful in his bid to dismiss the case prior to trial by prevailing on a case-dispositive summary judgment which disposed of the case and dictated that Plaintiff take nothing by its action.  Plaintiff subsequently appealed the case to the Dallas Court of Appeals where the trial court judgment was affirmed, preserving our client’s defense victory.

CSA-Credit Solutions of America, Inc. v. Precept Financial Solutions Inc.

In the Matter of the Arbitration between CSA-Credit Solutions of America, Inc. v. Precept Financial Solutions Inc.; No. 711480044506 before the American Arbitration Association

Mr. Kennedy’s client, Precept Financial Solutions, Inc. was sued for breach of a settlement contract and breach of a non-compete agreement. Mr. Kennedy filed counter-claims against Plaintiff for breach of contract and fraud.  After the arbitration hearing, Mr. Kennedy’s client was awarded damages by the arbitrator. The Plaintiff took nothing.

Meadowbrook Homes v. Jerry Sandoval

Meadowbrook Homes v. Jerry Sandoval; Cause No.  05-05651, in the 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Mr. Kennedy represented Defendant who was sued for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties arising from a dispute over the construction of high-end homes in the Dallas area. Mr. Kennedy filed counter-claims on behalf of Defendant against the Plaintiff for breach of contract, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment and fraud. The case proceeded to trial and the Firm’s client was awarded judgment. The Plaintiff took nothing.

Page 1 of 1 pages
 

Unless otherwise indicated herein, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

©2010 Hanshaw Kennedy, LLP. All rights reserved worldwide.
Disclaimer | Privacy Statement